He lounges back with icy cold beer in hand. Laughing with easy confidence at the smart banter being traded across the outdoor table. Surrounded by a dozen or so friends. Legally adults now, for the most part. Taking a brief but well-earned break from the madness that is studying for terminal exams, before finishing their school careers and scattering on the winds of fate.
I’m proud of the person he has become. What all of them have become. More than a little envious of the adventures they are about to embark on. They have survived secondary school intact, and largely unscathed. Of their 250 student cohort who started the journey, there have been no deaths. No (admitted) overdoses. No babies. Only one custodial sentence. Amazing!
These kids have outgrown their childhood ambitions to become an astronaut or ballerina. Firefighter or fairy princess. Professional footballer or social media influencer. Recognising that were destined to happen, they would be well on their way towards it already.
Some are bound for university. Cambridge. Oxford. Bristol. Manchester. STEM subjects all.
Already caught in the rat race.
Do it younger.
Get there faster.
Succeed or die trying.
Endlessly competing.
Not yet figuring out nobody is watching. That they race only against themselves.
Several will take gap years.
Backpacking Southeast Asia or South America. Interrailing Europe. Working surf beaches and ski fields. Funded by lowly paying, lowly skilled jobs. Barista. Bar staff. Bouncer. Construction. Delivery driver. English language instructor. Nanny. Personal trainer. Retail. Teaching assistant.
The motivations behind taking a year out are interesting. Adventure seeking. Postponing adulthood. Often a salve for bruised egos. Putting a positive spin on grades that were not quite good enough to take them where they wanted to go. Familial social networks not quite influential enough that the rules for outsiders don’t apply to them.
Unwilling to attend the “other” Oxford, Bristol, or Manchester universities. Not yet, anyway.
None of these kids have the connections to pursue the bright lights and big money of the City. A tour of duty in an investment bank, before graduating to Private Equity. Not yet, anyway.
None aspire to be management consultants. Cannon fodder for the Big 4. Not yet, anyway.
None yet surrendering hope for pragmatism. Dreams for a big mortgage in a commuter town.
On his 18th birthday, my son received control of his “junior” ISA.
Actually, that is a lie. On his 18th birthday my access to his ISA automatically ceased, but it took six weeks of chasing before he overcame “know your customer” bureaucracy and assumed control. Welcome to adulthood!
A valuable life lesson in persistence and processes not designed with success in mind.
I had to smile at the feeling of déjà vu I felt on that day.
When I was born, my father took out a life assurance policy on me. His new father fantasy was to provide future me with life insurance options, should I one day work in bomb disposal, as a stunt man, or a test pilot. If not, I could cash it out and use it as a house deposit.
18 years later, the only form of mortal peril I experienced was attending a rough school specialising in vocational classes such as car stealing, drug dealing, and teenage pregnancy.
Unfortunately, nearly two decades of inflation combined with compounding high fees saw the value of that policy amount to roughly what my student shop assistant job earned in a month. An amount that, when he purchased it, would have purchased 5% of my father’s house.
Now, here I was, equally well intentioned, yet repeating my father’s folly. I appreciated the irony.
The grand reveal for my son wasn’t an ISA full of untold riches. Bitcoin proxies. Thousand-bagger meme stocks. Unicorn start-ups bought for peanuts long ago, but now worth millions.
Instead, it contained a five-figure portfolio of low-fee global index trackers. Better than a hat full of rabbits, but hardly the life changing head-start I had once naïvely fantasised of providing.
My son was grateful, and somewhat humbled.
After doing the maths, he determined it might make him a paper millionaire sometime in his 50s. Which sounded impressive, until I got him to adjust for purchasing power and he realised that by then a million would be as underwhelming as my father’s gift had once been to me.
To his credit, he decided to leave the ISA alone, and let it ride. His choice, it was now his money.
Money he has access to while he is young enough for it to make a difference. Perhaps do some good. As opposed to an inheritance or pension plan that, unless he has made a real mess of his personal finances, by the age he eventually receives it, he should no longer have a need for it.
That thought gave me pause to reflect on my own evolving beliefs, words, and deeds when it comes to managing money. If I were starting out today, how would I approach things?
Once I believed that business ownership was the most likely route to riches. Creating wealth. Profiting from my efforts, and those of my employees.
I still believe that, but no longer run my own business. Exposing a blind spot. Meaning I’m either a hypocrite in the “do as I say, but not as I do” sense, or not currently living true to my values.
My investing first principle has long been the importance of cash flow. The margin between earning and spending representing how wealthy I feel.
Early on, I naïvely embraced the purity of “natural” income streams. Enjoying the feeling as investment income began to cover my recurring lifestyle costs one bill at a time.
My simple plan was to eventually replace my earned income entirely, buying control of my time.
In time, I learned that prioritising cash flow over capital growth was a form of financial self-harm. Fast growing companies like Amazon, Alphabet, Facebook, and Netflix didn’t pay dividends. Neither did slow but steady giants like Berkshire Hathaway.
It was total return that really mattered.
This led to a further lesson: the importance of considering total returns after tax.
Capital gains are typically subject to lower rates of taxation than dividend or rental income. A second benefit is the timing of gains is usually chosen by the investor, while the timing of dividend or rental income is chosen for them.
The tax tail should never wag the investment dog, but being cognisant of the tax rules and available work arounds can make a material difference to our investment cash flow and returns.
For a long time, I embraced the power of leverage to buy property using other people’s money. Capital gain plays, where the real money was made on the way in. Identify locations about to boom, then play landlord to offset holding costs while waiting for my bets to pay off.
I still appreciate the merits of investing other people’s money, but recently disposed of the last of my directly held investment property portfolio. The excuse I tell myself is that the regulatory risks of being a landlord have significantly increased over recent years. The reason has more to do with age: leverage is a young person’s game.
Once we acquire wealth, our fear of losing what we have starts to exceed our desire for more.
This creates some cognitive dissonance.
On the one hand, I recognise that I only got to where I am financially today by regularly planting money trees starting some 30 years ago.
On the other hand, I am conscious I have been chopping down those same money trees at a faster rate than I have been replanting them. Not in a financially suicidal “living beyond my means” sense, but rather by trading the accessibility and flexibility of leveraged investments for the trapped (in many senses of the word) equity of home ownership.
Which might make sense, for those striving to own outright their “forever” homes. Trading future investment capital growth prospects in exchange for reducing their recurring housing costs. By in doing so, reducing their need for future cash flows to support their living costs.
Except I’m not one of those.
The money trees I do plant today are generally locked away inside pension wrappers. Much like formerly wild animals who now find themselves trapped inside aquariums, pet stores, or the zoo. Featuring bold warning signs to the public, demanding they “look, but don’t touch”.
A wise man once said: behind every warning sign is a lawsuit, behind every lawsuit is a story.
Intellectually, I know the accumulated pension funds should be waiting for me later in life.
Impatiently, I also know that those accumulated pension funds can’t be used to buy my groceries today.
Instinctively, I have little faith that governments won’t have changed the rules and moved the goal posts by the time I reach pension accessibility age. Is it still paranoia if they really are out to get you?
I’m conscious I have used the word “trapped” twice in half a page. If accessible cash flows made me feel wealthy, its opposite leaves me feeling trapped.
Reversing the buying control of my time.
Pushing me back the other way, towards being dependent upon salaried income.
Recurring lifestyle costs funded by pay cheques. Just like all the other suit wearing lemmings trudging dejectedly out of the underground each morning, selling off their lives by the day.
I used to be better than that.
Which tells me I’ve taken the after-tax part of the total return equation too far.
And also that I have “too much house”.
But that is something we already knew!
Some lessons in life, like not going to the toilet straight after chopping up chilli peppers, can only be learned by doing.
Something my son and his friends are about to discover for themselves, as they venture out into the world to start their own lives.
Andy 19 April 2025
Thoughtful reflections, honestly and cleverly written, as ever.
{in·deed·a·bly} 19 April 2025 — Post author
Thanks Andy.
Rhino 19 April 2025
That’s interesting on the JISA. So that’s how they work is it? Parental access is revoked on 18th birthday? How does that actually happen? Do you get letters beforehand telling you to register in child’s name with new password or something?
Too much house not entirely your fault though right? Certain amount of coercion involved?
{in·deed·a·bly} 19 April 2025 — Post author
Thanks Rhino.
It varies by provider.
Parents lose the right to view their child’s accounts the day the kid turns 18. Makes sense, personal privacy etc.
In my son’s case, for his ISA and an old bank account I’d set up for him when he was little, that removal was automated and occurred on the day.
For the ISA, I received a letter about a month before telling me that would happen. He should have received a corresponding onboarding letter, but for whatever reason that never arrived. When he chased them, he had to go through all the new customer process including proof of identity, proof of address, etc.
He received a new login, new password, and so on. That also makes sense, freeing new adults from potentially overbearing attentions of parents.
For the bank account, neither of us received any notification. That one has been a bit of a pain, as it was an account abroad. He no longer has a permanent address there, so was unable to pass the identity verification. After a couple of attempts and 45 minutes on hold, he gave up.
Another valuable life lesson there: gifts are a case of “easy come, easy go“. People don’t value them the same way they would if they’d had to earn them. Explains in part why so many people piss away their inheritances on cruises and new kitchens.
I’m a grown up, life is about choices. Choices have consequences. Excuses don’t change the outcome. I own that.
Heather 19 April 2025
I always love your posts – likely because they reflect so much of where I am in life. We are of very similar age and battling similar financial, family and life challenges.
{in·deed·a·bly} 19 April 2025 — Post author
Thanks Heather. Best of luck with the challenges and cat herding!
Michelle 22 April 2025
Milestone birthdays are odd. Especially after the 18th, which seems to me the last one anything really changes at. Congratulations to your son. May he eventually enjoy spending that hard-fought ISA access!!
I have a supposedly ‘big’ birthday fast approaching. Just another day really, but it’s a useful point to ponder if life feels like it’s going in the direction you want it to. Make changes if not. Just as importantly, guilt-free celebrating 🤣.
It’s interesting on your ‘trapped’ point. That was always exactly the reason I put up with my commute for so long. Less house, more financial freedom.
Just knowing I could leave the job if I really couldn’t deal with it anymore was often enough to get me through the rougher days. So long as you know why you’re doing it all, which I think you do?
{in·deed·a·bly} 22 April 2025 — Post author
Thanks Michelle. Happy big birthday, hope you celebrate aging disgracefully with much fun and loved ones!
18th is probably the only milestone that really matters. The before and after in terms of legal rights, parental obligations, and the like is huge. The rest are great excuses to celebrate completing [n] laps while enjoying the view from the right side of the grass.
Agree on the house point. A challenge for future me to unravel.
Pendle Witch 22 April 2025
The fun of the JISA! Our daughter has had 3 years of control, and has used the “pretend it’s not there” trick to avoid plundering it. Nothing more has been contributed so it’s now easy to see the accumulation, which is a useful illustration of what can happen to money if you save it rather than spend it! How long that will continue, I don’t know, but we did what we could. Anything else from BoMaD, apart from university support, will arrive when necessary.
In terms of future careers for our children, that’s a tricky one. The world is changing so fast and in some respect it feels like it might be better to not play the game. Global corps are, to an extent, farming us; interesting start-ups are mostly looking to get the big buy-out (as you previously said!), and climate change is rolling down the road unstoppably while the big mad guys try to ignore it and make even more money. (I could say I’m more fun in real life, but that’s not the case!)
Anyway, great to see a couple of posts from you recently; all the best to you and yours.
{in·deed·a·bly} 22 April 2025 — Post author
Thanks Pendle Witch. Great to hear your daughter has learned the ancient art of delayed gratification. That is a wonderful life lesson to have mastered so early on!
Good luck negotiating the challenges of BoMaD, remember what they tell us on aeroplanes about “fitting your own mask before helping others“. Tricky to get right, but hopefully mitigated by being able (and willing) to lean on them in return should our longevity outrun our finances.
The job stuff is interesting. My elder son appears to have settled on behavioural economics or psychology (which is really two sides of the same coin). He figures people will always do predictably dumb things with their money and then want someone objective to talk about it with afterwards. He might be on to something, in much the same way that there will always be demand for undertakers! As for my younger one, he’s probably aged out of a route into professional sports, but I still have hope for his future rock star career.
Donna 26 April 2025
My son also got control of his ISA at 18. 3 years on, his money is still there for a house one day, when he graduates and settles in a job. I still have ‘access’ as he has given me his login details to update the family spreadsheet. We have more open talks about money and the IHT sledgehammer than I ever had when I was at his age.
{in·deed·a·bly} 26 April 2025 — Post author
Thanks Donna. Fantastic that he’s planning for the future, and open to advice from yourself.
David Andrews 26 April 2025
“Instinctively, I have little faith that governments won’t have changed the rules and moved the goal posts by the time I reach pension accessibility”
The proposed inclusion of residual DC pension pots within IHT shows how tricky longer term financial planning is.
Of course, those proposed changes come from those with tax payer underwritten DB pensions.
Anyway, according to the current government, I’m the worst of all people as I bought a house in a specific catchment area, have a second home ( I kept my first house in case of conscious uncoupling ) and have unearned income from many years of investment.
I’ll soon need to decide if I call it a day at 55 before my pension accessible date gets shoved back to 57.
Apparently the government support aspiration, just don’t aspire too much.
{in·deed·a·bly} 27 April 2025 — Post author
Thanks David.
The recent IMF world economic outlook report quoted research from across a few dozen countries that found in 2022 the average 70-year-old had the same cognitive abilities as the average 53 year old enjoyed in 2000. The average 53 year old in 2000 was also more than a decade away from (then) traditional retirement age. It doesn’t take a genius to do the math and realise that 85 will become the new
666768. The economy ends up with too many takers for every giver without it.The good news is those fortunate enough to have locked away funds in a private pension are ok, their access date absolutely locked in to the much younger
5557. Oh wait…But fear not, providing your 80-year-old self can successfully navigate your zimmer frame on the tube to obey the return to the office mandate, you’ll have a bunch of AI colleagues to talk to while you tap away on your laptop at your hot desk. If you’re a really good boy, you’ll be rewarded for your diligence with an annual performance bonus equating to roughly minimum wage when divided by hours worked to earn it. But most of that will have been offset by public transport costs and buying lunches at the local sandwich shops while you
subsidisepatriotically support the City’s hospitality community.David Andrews 2 May 2025
Hopefully my investments will remain on track to allow a much earlier exit. I do wonder if I should do “one more year” in order to help my son (10) get a headstart though.
However, is it better to pass on knowledge, experiences and “family tine” or simply finances ?
Anyway, I do wonder if we’ve already reached the tipping point where there aren’t enough “paying in” to support those who are receiving.
{in·deed·a·bly} 2 May 2025 — Post author
I guess the question is “how much is enough?”
Enough for you to lead the lifestyle you wish to enjoy for as long as you expect to enjoy it.
But also, how much “headstart” is enough? Pay for his gap year? Pay for his uni fees? Pay for his house deposit?
At some point our kids need to (and hopefully want to) stand on their own two feet. There are a few of elements of that:
It is scarcity that creates value, meaning if we never struggled then we never appreciate the value of money in the sense of what it costs to obtain it.
But also we value something we’ve had to work for far more than we ever would a gift (or loan).
Finally, how do we learn how to be functional independent adults if our well-meaning parents won’t let us learn by doing (and fail) on our own? Much better to experience those lessons early on when we have nothing to lose and plenty of time to recovery, than to be a man-child having to figure out money in our 50s when the stakes are higher and there isn’t time for a do-over.
It’s great that parents want to help their progeny. Often, the best help we can give is to get out of the way and let our kids do it on their own.
Rhino 1 May 2025
That 70 is the new 53 is such an unbelievable statistic that I’m not sure I’m going to believe it. What does it even mean? Cognitive ability being such an ephemeral term as to be unquantifiable.
In terms of retirement ages, it’s not cognitive ability that matters, it’s life expectancy. I.e. how long you can be expected to consume stuff for. That’s the key problem. But life expectancy has topped out for now, assuming no radical step change in some life extending technology. Some noises that it’s actually reducing due to the effects of largely UPF diets.
David Andrews 2 May 2025
I suspect the response was a little “tongue in cheek”. However, there’s no escaping that unaffordable promises have been made and they cannot be honoured.
I’m 53 and if the triple lock is retained then I suspect the state pension will be circa £20k per annum when I finally might be able to claim it.
The future costs will be unaffordable even if pension ages are pushed back, income tax thresholds frozen and IHT thresholds frozen.
Too many recipients and not enough contributors.
But hey, I’ve paid my stamp for over 35 years so I’m entitled.
{in·deed·a·bly} 3 May 2025 — Post author
I was reading about the recent Australian election today. Apparently for the first time there were more Gen-Z + Millennial voters than Boomers. Which changed the election issues to things that interested younger people such as cost of living and housing “crisis“. Somebody smarter than me once observed that “demographics are destiny“, so as the pendulum swings towards a lower population age then inevitably old folks will begin to lose some of their favoured treatments in favour of things that benefit the larger voting block.
David Andrews 3 May 2025
I guess that compulsory voting also helps. The recent UK council elections had a pretty poor turnout.
Consequently it was the demographic who actually vote that had the impact.
Mostly I expect it was a protest vote. Unfortunately I suspect the party who shall not be named, have no ability to deliver much of what they promised.
That’s politics though.